...em V signal API. This API is obsolete: new applications should use the POSIX signal API ( sigaction (2), sigprocmask (2), etc.) The sigset () function modifies the disposition o…...em V signal API. This API is obsolete: new applications should use the POSIX signal API ( sigaction (2), sigprocmask (2), etc.) The sigset () function modifies the disposition o…...em V signal API. This API is obsolete: new applications should use the POSIX signal API ( sigaction (2), sigprocmask (2), etc.) The sigset () function modifies the disposition o…...em V signal API. This API is obsolete: new applications should use the POSIX signal API ( sigaction (2), sigprocmask (2), etc.) The sigset () function modifies the disposition o…...bsd_signal () Thread safety MT-Safe VERSIONS Use of bsd_signal () should be avoided; use sigaction (2) instead. On modern Linux systems, bsd_signal () and signal (2) are equival…...BSD signal API. This API is obsolete: new applications should use the POSIX signal API ( sigaction (2), sigprocmask (2), etc.). The sigvec () function sets and/or gets the dispo…...BSD signal API. This API is obsolete: new applications should use the POSIX signal API ( sigaction (2), sigprocmask (2), etc.). The sigvec () function sets and/or gets the dispo…...BSD signal API. This API is obsolete: new applications should use the POSIX signal API ( sigaction (2), sigprocmask (2), etc.). The sigvec () function sets and/or gets the dispo…...BSD signal API. This API is obsolete: new applications should use the POSIX signal API ( sigaction (2), sigprocmask (2), etc.). The sigvec () function sets and/or gets the dispo…...BSD signal API. This API is obsolete: new applications should use the POSIX signal API ( sigaction (2), sigprocmask (2), etc.). The sigvec () function sets and/or gets the dispo…...s used during the execution of a signal handler if the establishment of that handler (see sigaction (2)) requested it. The normal sequence of events for using an alternate signa…...ysv_signal () Thread safety MT-Safe VERSIONS Use of sysv_signal () should be avoided; use sigaction (2) instead. On older Linux systems, sysv_signal () and signal (2) were equiv…...post() failed\n", 18); _exit(EXIT_FAILURE); } } int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { struct sigaction sa; struct timespec ts; int s; if (argc != 3) { fprintf(stderr, "Usage: %s <a…...post() failed\n", 18); _exit(EXIT_FAILURE); } } int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { struct sigaction sa; struct timespec ts; int s; if (argc != 3) { fprintf(stderr, "Usage: %s <a…...post() failed\n", 18); _exit(EXIT_FAILURE); } } int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { struct sigaction sa; struct timespec ts; int s; if (argc != 3) { fprintf(stderr, "Usage: %s <a…...he receiving process has installed a handler for this signal using the SA_SIGINFO flag to sigaction (2), then it can obtain this data via the si_value field of the siginfo_t str…...d as the third argument to a signal handler (see the discussion of the SA_SIGINFO flag in sigaction (2)). If the context was obtained by a call of getcontext (), program executi…...d as the third argument to a signal handler (see the discussion of the SA_SIGINFO flag in sigaction (2)). If the context was obtained by a call of getcontext (), program executi…...Older glibc versions implemented raise () using kill (2). SEE ALSO getpid (2), kill (2), sigaction (2), signal (2), pthread_kill (3), signal (7)...l profiling provides more accurate results. SEE ALSO gprof (1), sprof (1), setitimer (2), sigaction (2), signal (2)